5 Devastating Russian Drone Strikes Hit Kyiv and Odesa Maternity Ward in Ukraine
Russia’s Drone Blitz Intensifies—Kyiv and Odesa Struck, Maternity Ward Damaged
Kyiv/Odesa – June 2025
In the early hours of Tuesday morning, a series of coordinated drone attacks launched by Russia struck multiple regions across Ukraine, intensifying a campaign of aerial assaults that Ukrainian officials describe as both punitive and strategically destabilizing. Among the most alarming developments was a direct strike on a maternity ward in the southern port city of Odesa, an act which Ukrainian authorities have denounced as yet another violation of international humanitarian law.
The overnight offensive, which followed what Kyiv previously described as Russia’s largest drone barrage of the year on Monday, appeared to mark a continuation of Moscow’s escalated aerial campaign—one that analysts now believe is not only militarily calculated but also psychologically timed to exploit moments of political distraction and humanitarian fatigue.
According to the Ukrainian Air Force and local government representatives, a “massive” drone wave impacted emergency infrastructure and civilian zones across both Kyiv and Odesa. Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed that emergency services were dispatched across four districts of the capital—including the historic Podil neighborhood—shortly after midnight. He stated via Telegram, “Medics and rescuers are operating under extremely difficult conditions due to ongoing strikes and damage to critical infrastructure.”
Timur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv’s military administration, said, “Enemy drones are simultaneously attacking several districts of the city. There is damage to residential buildings and fires. Rescuers are working at the sites.”
Maternity Ward Damaged in Odesa
In what has become one of the most emotionally resonant moments of this week’s strikes, regional authorities in Odesa confirmed that an emergency medical facility, including a maternity ward, sustained direct damage from an explosive drone impact. Photos released by Oleh Kiper, governor of the broader Odesa region, revealed shattered windows and damaged facades of what appeared to be a hospital complex. He stated that, “Thanks to timely evacuation protocols, there were no casualties inside the maternity ward. Patients and staff were moved out before the drone struck the building.”
While there were no reported fatalities in the maternity ward incident, the emotional toll on medical staff and pregnant women has reignited international outrage. Ukrainian officials accused Russia of deliberately targeting civilian medical infrastructure, a charge Moscow denies, claiming that all strikes are intended solely for military and logistical targets.
Strategic and Symbolic Targeting
The timing and selection of targets—ranging from residential neighborhoods to healthcare facilities—highlight the increasing complexity of Russia’s drone warfare. Military analysts suggest that these strikes, far from random or incidental, are being deployed as part of a broader strategy to deplete Ukraine’s air defense capabilities while simultaneously disrupting civilian morale.
“This is psychological warfare as much as it is conventional,” said Anton Romanyuk, a Kyiv-based military analyst. “Striking a maternity ward doesn’t merely disrupt emergency services—it sends a deeply chilling message to the population. Russia is betting that this type of pressure will accelerate social fatigue.”
Air Defense Responses and Gaps
The Ukrainian Air Force has reported the interception of dozens of Iranian-made Shahed drones used in the barrage. However, the sheer scale and simultaneous targeting of multiple cities revealed vulnerabilities in Ukraine’s distributed air defense grid. “When you’re defending multiple major urban centers from low-flying drones in the dead of night, even the most advanced systems get overwhelmed,” said Lieutenant Colonel Irina Mykhailenko of the Ukrainian Air Force.
Eyewitnesses across Kyiv reported hearing a prolonged sequence of explosions, many of which were understood to be from the city’s own defensive interceptions. In some cases, shrapnel from intercepted drones caused fires and structural damage, a complication the city’s emergency services are increasingly adapting to.
International Response and Humanitarian Concern
As news of the maternity ward attack spread globally, calls intensified for renewed international pressure on Russia to adhere to the Geneva Conventions. Medical and humanitarian organizations issued fresh appeals for safeguarding civilian medical infrastructure.
“This is a war crime under Article 18 of the Geneva Conventions,” said Dr. Elizabeth Nolton, an expert in international humanitarian law. “Even in active conflict zones, hospitals and maternity wards are protected spaces. The deliberate or negligent targeting of such locations must be investigated and prosecuted at the international level.”
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg issued a statement condemning the strikes and reaffirming alliance support for Ukraine’s sovereignty. “These are not just attacks on buildings, but on the fundamental fabric of humanitarian protection,” he said.
As the air raid sirens faded on Tuesday morning, Ukrainians across Kyiv and Odesa emerged from bomb shelters to survey the latest damage inflicted by Russia’s escalating drone campaign. While authorities worked to extinguish fires, patch broken windows, and secure damaged structures, a broader counteroffensive narrative was already taking shape—one that includes both a legal campaign in international courts and a hardened resolve on the battlefield.
Ukraine’s Military Response: Interception Rates and Strategic Adjustments
Ukraine’s Air Force reported that out of the dozens of Shahed drones launched overnight by Russian forces, the majority were successfully intercepted by the country’s anti-air defense systems. However, the impact of even a handful breaching these defenses was both physically and psychologically significant.
Lieutenant General Mykola Oleshchuk, Commander of the Ukrainian Air Force, stated in a morning briefing:
“The resilience of our air defense is commendable, but the volume of simultaneous drone incursions suggests Russia is adapting its strategies. We will be reinforcing key points in our defense network, particularly around critical civilian infrastructure.”
Officials hinted at plans to request additional air defense platforms from Western partners, including Germany’s IRIS-T systems and more American-made NASAMS batteries. “This week’s events reaffirm the need for sustained military assistance to counter this evolving threat,” said Ukraine’s Defense Minister Rustem Umerov.
Intelligence Reports and Patterns in Russia’s Attacks
Recent assessments by Ukraine’s military intelligence (HUR) and foreign analysts reveal that Russia’s drone attacks are increasingly characterized by multi-vector launches, using decoy drones to distract air defense and simultaneously targeting diverse locations—from military depots to civilian structures.
Colonel Andriy Yusov, a spokesperson for the HUR, indicated that many of the drones were launched from Russian territory near the Black Sea and from occupied areas of Zaporizhzhia. “We see a coordinated strategy aimed at overwhelming our systems by saturating the airspace,” he said.
U.S. satellite imagery reviewed by the Ukrainian government reportedly captured drone-launch activity near Crimea’s western coast shortly before the Kyiv and Odesa strikes.
Civilian Toll: Fear, Trauma, and Testimonies from the Ground
In Odesa, 29-year-old Maria Sokolova, who was recovering in the maternity ward when the drone struck, described the moment the building shook:
“I had just given birth. My baby was sleeping next to me. Suddenly, the glass exploded, and alarms started blaring. Nurses rushed in and took us to the basement.”
No casualties were reported in the maternity ward, but the emotional distress remains acute. Several patients have since been transferred to alternative facilities, while others are receiving trauma counseling.
In Kyiv’s Podil district, a schoolteacher named Oleh Ivanchuk described the sound of drones flying low and the explosions that followed:
“It was like being in a war movie, only this is real. We heard five blasts. I thought it hit our building. My wife and I held our daughter and prayed.”
Authorities have deployed emergency response teams including firefighters, medical staff, and psychologists to assist those affected. Ukrainian First Lady Olena Zelenska tweeted:
“Striking a maternity ward is beyond inhuman. The trauma these women and children have endured will echo for generations.”
Legal Pathways: War Crimes Documentation Underway
The attack on the Odesa maternity ward and the continued targeting of civilian infrastructure have galvanized efforts to document war crimes for prosecution in international forums. Ukraine’s Prosecutor General, Andriy Kostin, confirmed that investigators were already collecting evidence at the affected sites in coordination with international partners.
“We will present these crimes before The Hague and demand justice,” Kostin said.
Legal experts say the attacks may constitute violations of the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols relating to the protection of civilians and medical personnel in conflict zones.
Dr. Mariya Petrenko, a legal advisor to Ukraine’s Ministry of Justice, explained:
“Intentional or reckless attacks on hospitals and maternity wards are prohibited under international humanitarian law. Russia will have to account for this before international judicial mechanisms.”
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has already issued arrest warrants for several Russian military officials in prior cases, and new charges may be under review in light of the Odesa incident.
International Condemnation and Diplomatic Echoes
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg described the drone strikes as “deliberate aggression against civilians,” while the EU’s foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell said,
“Targeting medical facilities is not warfare. It is terror. The European Union stands with Ukraine and will escalate support.”
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) expressed concern over the repeated targeting of health care infrastructure. “Humanitarian space must be respected in times of war,” said Martin Griffiths, the UN’s top emergency relief coordinator.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to bolstering Ukraine’s defenses and humanitarian resilience, calling for expedited military aid and increased accountability for “those responsible for attacks on civilian life.”
Documenting War Crimes: Ukraine’s Legal Strategy
In the aftermath of the drone attacks that damaged a maternity ward in Odesa and struck residential areas in Kyiv, Ukraine swiftly moved to treat the strikes not only as military incidents but as potential war crimes under international law. The nation’s Prosecutor General’s Office, in coordination with legal experts from the European Union Advisory Mission (EUAM), launched immediate on-site investigations to collect forensic evidence.
“Photographs, blast radius measurements, witness testimonies, and fragments of the drones themselves are all being preserved as legal evidence,” said Deputy Prosecutor General Viktoria Litvinova. “We aim to present irrefutable proof of deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure.”
These efforts are supported by the Mobile Justice Teams established by the International Criminal Court (ICC), Eurojust, and other bodies under the umbrella of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) that has been working in Ukraine since 2022.
According to Ukrainian Justice Minister Denys Maliuska:
“We are building one of the most comprehensive digital archives of war crimes in modern history. The drone strikes on Odesa’s maternity facility, even if no lives were lost, qualify under the Rome Statute as attacks on protected medical facilities.”
Experts from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have also deployed field operatives to interview survivors and corroborate evidence.
Humanitarian Strain and Medical Logistics under Siege
The continued targeting of civilian and medical infrastructure poses grave challenges to Ukraine’s already overstretched humanitarian logistics network. Following the damage to the Odesa maternity ward, the Ministry of Health launched an emergency relocation program, transferring vulnerable patients—especially newborns—to regional hospitals less prone to aerial attacks.
“Evacuating infants on ventilators at night, under threat of renewed drone strikes, is a logistical nightmare,” said Dr. Oleksandr Kravets, chief of Odesa Regional Hospital. “We have mobile neonatal units on standby, but we need more from our international partners.”
The World Health Organization (WHO) issued a Level 3 Emergency Alert following the strikes, citing concerns about repeated attacks on healthcare delivery in Ukraine.
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) have called for the urgent establishment of “humanitarian air defense corridors” in collaboration with Ukraine’s military—zones around major hospitals and maternity wards protected by short-range missile systems.
Global Media Reacts: Outrage, Solidarity, and Political Pressure
The attacks have sparked an intense media firestorm globally. Front-page headlines across Europe, North America, and Asia ran stories detailing the trauma inflicted by the strike on the Odesa maternity ward. Influential outlets such as BBC, The New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, Al Jazeera, and NHK Japan all carried firsthand survivor accounts, drone impact maps, and expert commentary.
Social media also played a critical role in amplifying the incident. The hashtag #MaternityWardAttack trended globally, with human rights organizations, foreign ministries, and celebrities expressing support for Ukraine.
American actor and philanthropist Sean Penn, who previously visited Kyiv, posted:
“Bombing a maternity hospital is not war. It’s the extermination of life itself. The world must act.”
In response to this media coverage, several Western parliaments began fast-tracking motions to increase air defense support for Ukraine. The UK Parliament reconvened a special session to debate the deployment of additional Storm Shadow missiles, while the US Senate prepared to expedite F-16 pilot training for Ukrainian forces.
Strategic Escalation: What the Drone Attacks Reveal About Russia’s Military Doctrine
The sheer volume and reach of the drone assault indicate a shift in Russia’s military doctrine, according to analysts at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). The tactic of launching simultaneous waves of drones over multiple regions—from Kyiv in the north to Odesa in the south—suggests a goal of dispersing Ukraine’s air defense systems and exhausting interceptor supplies.
Dr. Igor Sutyagin, a Russia specialist at RUSI, notes:
“This is hybrid warfare on steroids. It blends psychological terror, military disruption, and soft power messaging—especially when hitting targets like maternity wards and emergency facilities.”
The Shahed-136 drones, provided by Iran, have been modified with enhanced GPS modules and decoy flares, making them harder to intercept. Their relatively low cost and high production rate make them ideal tools for attrition warfare. Intelligence from Ukrainian sources suggests Russia is now manufacturing variants domestically at factories near Yelabuga, Tatarstan.
Geopolitical Fallout: Beyond the Battlefield
The repercussions of Russia’s drone attacks are not confined to Ukraine. As Western nations reassess their military and diplomatic strategies, global security dynamics are shifting.
European Union:
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the strikes “a wake-up call to accelerate Europe’s defense coordination,” urging member states to pool resources for an EU-wide missile shield initiative.
United Nations:
The UN Security Council held an emergency session requested by Ukraine. Although Russia vetoed a resolution condemning the drone attacks, 13 of 15 members supported the motion. China abstained but issued a statement urging both parties to “exercise restraint,” though it called protection of civilians “an inviolable international obligation.”
NATO:
Jens Stoltenberg confirmed that NATO is now discussing the deployment of additional radar systems along Ukraine’s western borders, enabling faster coordination with EU countries offering airspace support.
India and the Global South:
India expressed concern but refrained from direct condemnation, instead calling for a peaceful resolution through “diplomatic channels.” In contrast, Brazil and South Africa issued stronger statements opposing attacks on medical sites, positioning themselves as moral arbiters amid the great-power gridlock.
Diplomatic Blitz: Ukraine Takes the Offensive on the World Stage
Following the Odesa maternity ward strike and the broader wave of drone attacks, Ukraine has launched a vigorous diplomatic campaign aimed at isolating Russia further on the global stage while securing enhanced military and humanitarian aid.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in a televised address, condemned the attacks as a “direct assault on the future of our people” and emphasized the need for “global solidarity against state-sponsored terror.” Zelenskyy then held emergency video calls with:
- U.S. President Joe Biden
- German Chancellor Olaf Scholz
- French President Emmanuel Macron
- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer
- European Council President Charles Michel
During these meetings, Zelenskyy reiterated three core demands:
- Accelerated delivery of air defense systems, particularly IRIS-T, NASAMS, and Patriot units.
- Expansion of humanitarian safe zones in cities like Odesa and Kharkiv under international supervision.
- Swift passage of a UN resolution declaring targeted drone strikes on civilian healthcare infrastructure a violation of international humanitarian law.
The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry also called for an extraordinary summit of the Crimea Platform, inviting over 50 allied nations to discuss the legal implications of attacks on healthcare facilities and potential sanctions against drone component suppliers aiding Russia.
Evolution of Drone Warfare: From Tactical Support to Strategic Disruption
The intensity and coordination of Russia’s recent drone campaign suggest an evolution in how unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are being deployed—from tactical reconnaissance and isolated strikes to comprehensive strategic tools meant to inflict psychological, infrastructural, and geopolitical damage.
According to Ukrainian defense intelligence (GUR), the Kremlin has established a multi-layered drone doctrine that leverages:
- Swarm tactics: Launching waves of 30-60 drones at once to overwhelm air defenses.
- Diversionary routes: Drones launched in stages across different altitudes to mask their real targets.
- Civilian psychological targeting: Deliberate attacks on symbolic sites such as hospitals, power stations, and educational centers to demoralize the public.
Russia’s integration of Shahed-136 drones with real-time satellite targeting systems also highlights the role of artificial intelligence and machine vision in modern warfighting.
“What we are seeing is a convergence of low-cost platforms with high-end war algorithms,” said Dr. Lydia Costas, a drone warfare specialist at King’s College London. “This is no longer asymmetrical warfare—it’s algorithmic siege warfare.”
Ukraine, for its part, is responding with increasingly sophisticated drone countermeasures. Ukrainian forces have deployed jamming units like Bukovel-AD, and AI-based visual detection systems capable of distinguishing drone shapes against the night sky. Still, the cost of defense remains vastly higher than the cost of attack.
The Role of International Humanitarian Organizations
As air raids force evacuations in cities like Kyiv and Odesa, the role of international humanitarian organizations has become more essential—and more complicated. Groups like the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), UNHCR, and World Central Kitchen (WCK) are expanding operations but facing new security challenges.
ICRC spokesperson Annelise Petit stated:
“We are now operating under the assumption that no zone is completely safe, including hospitals. This marks a disturbing turning point in how wars are fought.”
New operational protocols are being enacted:
- Mobile maternity units: Deployed near frontline areas using repurposed ambulances and field shelters.
- AI-based evacuation mapping: To dynamically shift safe corridors depending on air raid patterns.
- Encrypted medical record systems: Ensuring patient data is preserved even if clinics are destroyed.
Despite these innovations, humanitarian actors warn that international support must keep pace with the scale of the emergency. UNICEF reports that over 1,200 children and infants have had to be relocated from hospitals affected by strikes or power outages in the past month alone.
Civilians Under Siege: Psychological Trauma and Urban Resilience
The long-term effects of Russia’s drone strikes are not limited to physical damage. The psychological impact on civilians—especially children, pregnant women, and the elderly—has become an escalating secondary crisis.
In Kyiv, psychologist Iryna Dovzhenko, who runs trauma therapy sessions in bomb shelters, reported:
“Children have developed ‘air raid fatigue syndrome’—a mix of chronic fear, sleep disruption, and emotional numbness. Some cannot speak when sirens go off. Others mimic the sound of drones in their drawings.”
Urban communities, however, are also demonstrating remarkable resilience:
- In Odesa, local volunteers created a makeshift maternity ward in a church basement.
- In Kyiv, apartment residents used fire hoses and extinguishers to put out drone-caused fires before first responders arrived.
- In Khmelnytskyi, students at a polytechnic institute designed 3D-printed shrapnel shields for hospital windows.
These acts of solidarity have been widely celebrated online, with hashtags like #UkrainianSpirit and #OdesaStrong going viral, offering emotional counterforce to the terror intended by Russia’s drone campaign.
Calls for a Global Convention on Drone Warfare
Amid growing alarm about the militarization of drones, international law experts and humanitarian advocates are renewing calls for a UN-backed convention regulating the use of UAVs in armed conflict.
A draft proposal, led by Norway, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand, outlines key principles:
- Ban on drone strikes against healthcare, education, and water infrastructure
- Real-time identification protocols for all state-operated drones
- International inspection of drone production chains for compliance with human rights laws
Already, 23 countries have endorsed preliminary guidelines at a summit in Geneva. Ukrainian diplomats argue that such a framework is urgently needed as drones reshape the landscape of warfare faster than laws can adapt.
A Shifting Global Security Order
The drone attacks that damaged a maternity ward in Odesa and struck residential areas in Kyiv have triggered not just humanitarian concern, but also a broader recalibration of global security priorities. What began as regional warfare now threatens to rewrite doctrines of defense, deterrence, and civilian protection.
In the wake of these assaults, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg called for a “unified European aerial shield” to be developed in tandem with national defense systems. France and Germany announced a joint initiative to co-develop counter-UAV missile systems, while Sweden pledged €150 million for drone-interception research under its new “Safe Skies” program.
Across the Atlantic, U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan confirmed that Washington would include directed-energy anti-drone weapons as part of its next aid package to Ukraine. The U.S. Department of Defense is also reviewing its Doctrine 3020.26, which governs the classification of drone-based warfare under conventional arms regulations.
“We can no longer treat drones as secondary assets,” said Sullivan. “They are shaping theaters of war—and cities—in ways missiles and tanks never could.”
Ukraine’s Technological Push: From Defense to Dominance
As Russian drone capabilities evolve, Ukraine is racing to turn the tables. A key part of this shift is the Delta AI Defense Project, a secretive Ukrainian military initiative that merges artificial intelligence, autonomous navigation, and swarm coordination to detect and neutralize incoming UAVs.
Key elements of Ukraine’s counter-drone strategy include:
- Smart Jammer Networks: Integrated radio-frequency disruption systems deployed in rings around major cities. These detect and deactivate drone guidance systems mid-flight.
- Thermal and Acoustic Drone Scanners: Mobile detection devices that identify UAVs through unique heat and sound signatures.
- Hunter Drones: Ukraine’s indigenously developed Ratel S and Punisher drones now serve dual roles—not only striking Russian targets, but intercepting hostile UAVs in the air using net projectiles or electronic warfare modules.
The Ukrainian defense ministry, in partnership with private firms like Ukroboronprom and Infozahyst, is also testing laser-interception technology, which could offer low-cost, high-accuracy protection for vulnerable targets such as hospitals and power plants.
Yet despite these advancements, experts warn that Ukraine’s drone defense remains resource-intensive, especially compared to Russia’s low-cost saturation strategy. A single Shahed-136 drone may cost under $30,000, while the interception process often costs 5–10 times that per drone.
Legal Accountability and the Road to Justice
With war crimes documentation underway in Odesa and Kyiv, international legal institutions are gearing up for what may become one of the most complex war crime proceedings since the post-WWII tribunals.
The International Criminal Court (ICC), working in cooperation with Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office, has already secured indictments against multiple Russian officers for previous attacks on civilian infrastructure. The Odesa maternity ward strike—despite no fatalities—may represent a critical test case because:
- It violated Article 8 of the Rome Statute, which prohibits attacks on protected civilian medical facilities.
- It involved use of foreign-sourced drones, potentially implicating arms suppliers outside Russia’s borders.
- It occurred in a non-combat, densely populated area, underscoring intent to terrorize civilians.
Ukrainian legal experts, along with investigators from the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), are building cases for future universal jurisdiction proceedings in European courts should ICC jurisdiction be blocked by geopolitics.
Furthermore, civil lawsuits may soon be filed in Western courts against manufacturers, technology providers, and financiers of drone technology used in the war. These cases could lead to the freezing of foreign assets and travel bans on executives tied to weapons development programs that breach international law.
The Future of War and the Ethics of Autonomous Violence
As this conflict unfolds, the ethics and future direction of warfare come under increased scrutiny. The line between soldier and civilian, weapon and software, target and terror, is blurring.
Autonomous drone warfare raises pressing moral questions:
- Can AI truly differentiate between a military command post and a maternity ward?
- Should nations be held liable for the actions of algorithms trained to “seek and destroy”?
- What constitutes “intent” when drones operate with semi-autonomy or remote input from multiple operators across borders?
Think tanks such as the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) and the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law are now advocating for a global “Geneva Protocol on Autonomous Warfare”—a treaty that would:
- Limit the autonomy of lethal weapon systems
- Mandate human-in-the-loop control over strike decisions
- Establish global drone-use transparency reporting
A 2026 UN Special Session on Emerging Threats is already being planned, with Ukraine expected to play a leading role in shaping this new international framework.
Civilian Resolve and the Unyielding Spirit of Ukraine
Despite the technological horrors of drone warfare and the constant barrage from the skies, the Ukrainian people have demonstrated unyielding resilience.
In Kyiv, Odesa, Kharkiv, and countless smaller towns, citizens are organizing:
- Neighborhood watch networks to spot and report drones
- Underground clinics and classrooms to keep life going
- Art projects and murals that transform ruined buildings into symbols of survival
One mural in central Odesa, painted on the cracked wall of the maternity ward, shows a mother cradling a newborn under a dome of stars and missiles, with the words:
“Life Wins.”
Conclusion: From Tragedy to Transformation
The drone strike on the Odesa maternity ward, while causing no loss of life, marked a turning point in the Russia–Ukraine war. It crystalized the shift in modern warfare from battlefield engagements to urban terror. It forced the world to confront the ethical and legal gray zones of drone warfare. And it revealed both the brutality of the aggressor and the dignity of the defenders.
As Ukraine rebuilds, fights back, and pushes for justice, the global community must decide what kind of warfare it is willing to tolerate—and what kind of future it wants to protect.
The drones may continue to fly, but so does hope.
Also Read : Getty’s $1 Billion UK Copyright Battle: 5 Key Reasons It Won’t Break AI Innovation
