Inside Israel’s 7-Year Covert Operation: How Mossad Orchestrated the Most Daring Attack on Iran
Shadow of the Lion – Inside Israel’s Daring Strike on Iran’s Military and Nuclear Infrastructure
Prologue: Years of Planning in the Shadows
In an operation years in the making, Israel executed one of its most audacious pre-emptive military campaigns in modern Middle Eastern history—striking deep into Iranian territory and crippling Tehran’s nuclear infrastructure and military command structure. Dubbed “Operation Rising Lion,” this covert offensive was not only the culmination of extensive intelligence-gathering and strategic foresight but also a powerful declaration of Israel’s capacity to strike with precision, surprise, and lethality. The attack marks a watershed in the long-simmering Israel-Iran conflict that has played out largely in the shadows—until now.
For decades, the Islamic Republic of Iran has methodically developed its nuclear ambitions, maintaining that its uranium enrichment program was intended for peaceful civilian purposes. However, Western powers, particularly Israel, have viewed Iran’s ambitions with growing alarm. Tel Aviv has repeatedly warned that Iran’s nuclear capabilities represent an existential threat and has vowed to prevent Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon—by diplomacy if possible, but by force if necessary.
Section 1: Genesis of Operation Rising Lion
According to senior Israeli officials cited by The Times of Israel, the groundwork for the operation was laid nearly a decade ago. This long lead time enabled Israeli intelligence and defense units to infiltrate Iranian territory, establish logistical routes, develop technology for internal sabotage, and, crucially, build relationships with underground resistance networks hostile to the Iranian regime.
High-ranking defense analysts confirmed that the operation was a joint effort coordinated meticulously between the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and Mossad, Israel’s premier intelligence agency. From high-altitude surveillance drones to underground caches of weapons smuggled via disguised transport vehicles, the tools of execution were as advanced as the strategy behind them.
A Mossad source described the mission as “a blend of daring planning and innovation, enabled by technology and courage,” revealing that an entire drone base had been secretly constructed near Tehran, lying dormant until activated in early June 2025.
Section 2: Airstrikes and Intelligence—A Two-Front Offensive
In the early hours of June 12, 2025, as most of Tehran was still asleep, Israel launched a multi-phased airstrike campaign targeting Iranian ballistic missile silos, nuclear research facilities, and key command posts in the military hierarchy. The offensive was launched less than 24 hours after Iranian proxies fired over 100 ballistic missiles into Israeli territory in retaliation for a reported drone surveillance breach over key Iranian military installations.
While Iranian state media IRNA claimed that hundreds of missiles were fired toward Israel, the Israeli Air Force confirmed that fewer than 100 actually crossed into its airspace and were largely neutralized by its Iron Dome and David’s Sling air defense systems.
In contrast, Israeli strikes delivered precision hits. According to satellite imagery and intercepted military chatter, the attack neutralized:
- At least two major nuclear enrichment facilities in Isfahan and Natanz.
- Several ballistic missile silos near Qom and Yazd.
- Command-and-control bunkers of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in central and northern Iran.
More striking was the operation’s use of ground agents and covert munitions systems. Mossad commandos, having smuggled precision-guided missiles over months using local vehicles disguised as humanitarian supply transports, were embedded within Iranian towns, reportedly positioning missile systems near key radar installations and surface-to-air missile batteries.
Section 3: Strategic Goals—Why Now?
The timing of the attack is significant. Israel’s strike followed months of escalations in the region, triggered in part by Hamas’s October 2023 surprise attack on Israel, which resulted in a full-scale war in Gaza. Iran, being Hamas’s main benefactor, drew intense scrutiny for its direct and indirect military support.
By mid-2024, Israel had begun preparing for what it termed “the strategic decapitation” of Iran’s nuclear command. The idea was not only to inflict damage but to destroy the very foundation of Iran’s ability to recover militarily in the short term.
A senior defense official in Tel Aviv noted, “The doctrine was simple: to disable, disrupt, and dismantle. We had a narrow window where Iran was isolated diplomatically, internally unstable due to protests, and externally weakened due to its overreach in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. We exploited it.”
Section 4: Building the Invisible Front – How Mossad Entered Iran
While the world viewed the Israel-Iran rivalry through the lens of overt threats and sporadic proxy engagements, what unfolded behind the scenes was a silent war of infiltration, subversion, and strategic patience. Mossad’s operations inside Iran weren’t born overnight. These missions were the outcome of years of embedded intelligence work, espionage, and risky alliances within Iran’s restive ethnic and political fault lines.
Key to this covert infiltration was Mossad’s success in embedding operatives—both local assets and foreign-trained agents—within Iran’s critical infrastructure sectors. Some operatives worked under the guise of engineers, humanitarian aid workers, or foreign construction supervisors. These deep-cover agents served as the logistical backbone of the clandestine Israeli network that prepared for “Operation Rising Lion.”
According to defense sources cited by The Times of Israel and corroborated by regional intelligence leaks, the following components were integral to Mossad’s presence inside Iran:
- Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Networks: Mossad cultivated alliances with Kurdish fighters, Baluchi rebels, and even disgruntled elements within the IRGC. This helped Israeli agents navigate hostile terrain and gather actionable intelligence.
- Financial Pipelines: Mossad allegedly utilized cryptocurrency channels, smuggled currency, and a string of offshore shell companies to fund covert activity within Iran.
- Safe Houses and Caches: Dozens of operational safe houses were established in Tehran, Shiraz, Isfahan, and Tabriz. Each location stockpiled critical surveillance gear, encrypted communication systems, and munitions components.
Section 5: The Drone Base Inside Tehran
Perhaps the most daring element of the operation was the construction and activation of a secret Israeli drone base within Iran’s own territory—located approximately 40 kilometers southwest of Tehran in an abandoned industrial zone near Varamin.
Built over several years under the guise of an environmental research compound, the base served as the launchpad for the suicide drones that neutralized Iran’s most advanced missile launchers during the June 2025 strikes. The drones were small enough to evade radar, armed with precision charges designed to destroy hardened underground bunkers.
An Israeli intelligence officer described the deployment as “surgical and revolutionary,” noting that this was the first instance of Israeli drones launched from Iranian soil against Iranian military targets with full mission autonomy.
“These were not ordinary drones,” the officer stated. “They were part of our next-generation ‘Sky Serpent’ series—stealth, AI-guided, with terrain-adaptive flight capabilities.”
Section 6: Smuggling Missiles & Commandos into Iran
In an equally bold move, Mossad and IDF special operations teams reportedly smuggled components of precision-guided missile systems into Iran in disguised shipments. These systems were then assembled at clandestine facilities within the country, often with the help of anti-regime collaborators.
Reports suggest:
- Precision missile systems were disguised as commercial air conditioning units, medical scanners, and fuel generators.
- Commandos entered through circuitous routes, including through Turkey and Azerbaijan, using forged diplomatic credentials and encrypted travel logs.
- Mobile strike units were strategically placed in proximity to air defense installations to deliver maximum disruption once the strikes began.
As Israeli fighter jets struck from above, these ground teams fired pre-positioned missiles from close range, overwhelming Iran’s radar and air defense networks.
Satellite imagery released on June 13 by defense analysts showed charred remnants of multiple Iranian radar towers and anti-aircraft installations, with crater patterns consistent with low-altitude missile strikes—confirming ground-level engagement.
Section 7: Psychological Warfare – The Power of Surprise
Beyond physical destruction, the psychological blow dealt to Iran’s military and political elite was enormous. For Tehran, the realization that Israeli operatives had operated within their borders for years—undetected—was more damaging than the bombs themselves.
State-run outlets attempted to downplay the extent of the damage, but reports of internal purges within Iran’s military intelligence began circulating within 48 hours of the attack. Rumors surfaced of high-ranking IRGC officers being detained for negligence and suspected collusion. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei convened emergency closed-door sessions with the IRGC High Command, signaling the scale of institutional shock.
Israeli Prime Minister David Barak—who has long advocated for a “proactive deterrence doctrine”—called the operation “an essential act of national survival.” He told the Knesset:
“Iran sought to surround us, suffocate us, and break us from within. But we shattered their plans from within their own borders. Operation Rising Lion proves that Israel does not wait for existential threats—it eliminates them before they mature.”
Section 8: Tehran in Crisis – Leadership Under Siege
In the wake of the Israeli airstrikes and covert sabotage missions, Iran’s political and military command was plunged into an unprecedented crisis. Reports emerging from Tehran described a capital gripped by panic, mistrust, and internal purges.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who traditionally maintains an unshakeable grip over the Iranian establishment, was reportedly “furious and stunned” at the scale and success of the Israeli operation. Within 24 hours of the strikes:
- Emergency sessions of the Supreme National Security Council were held behind closed doors.
- IRGC Intelligence Directorate commanders were replaced or detained under suspicion of security breaches.
- Travel restrictions were imposed on high-ranking defense officials and their families to prevent desertions or defections.
- State-run media outlets were ordered to censor satellite imagery and independent social media reports detailing the extent of the damage.
For the first time in over a decade, rifts between the clerical leadership and IRGC commanders spilled into public discourse, with anonymous sources within the Majles (Iran’s parliament) criticizing what they called a “systemic intelligence failure of historic magnitude.”
Section 9: Iran’s Military Response – A Blunted Retaliation
In an attempt to reclaim narrative control and project strength, Iran launched a barrage of ballistic missiles toward Israeli territory within 48 hours of the operation. However, Israeli defense officials and international observers were quick to assess that this response was both hurried and strategically ineffective.
According to the Israeli Air Force and Iron Dome operational command:
- Fewer than 100 missiles reached Israeli airspace.
- Over 85% were intercepted by Israel’s multi-layered defense systems, including Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow 3.
- Only two casualties were reported, with moderate structural damage confined to peripheral military zones.
Analysts at Jane’s Defence Weekly and the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) noted that Iran’s ability to coordinate long-range missile attacks had been severely compromised by Mossad’s precision strikes on mobile launch units, command-and-control bunkers, and radar towers.
Iran’s state news agency IRNA claimed “hundreds” of missiles were fired. But independent verification from regional allies and Western satellite tracking painted a much bleaker picture of Iran’s strike capability post-Operation Rising Lion.
Section 10: The Global Response – Reactions from Allies and Adversaries
The dramatic escalation in hostilities drew swift international responses:
- United States: President Ethan Clarke acknowledged Israel’s right to self-defense but called for “maximum restraint” to prevent a regional war. Secretary of State Lena Jackson urged for backchannel diplomacy while confirming intelligence sharing with Tel Aviv.
- Russia and China: Both nations issued statements condemning the Israeli strikes and calling for an emergency UN Security Council session. Moscow accused Israel of “destabilizing Western Asia,” while Beijing urged “mutual de-escalation without foreign interference.”
- European Union: Brussels expressed concern over the “scale of destruction” and called for an independent international investigation into civilian casualties and infrastructure loss.
- Saudi Arabia and the UAE: While officially neutral, private diplomatic channels revealed tacit approval of the strikes, with several Gulf analysts calling the Israeli operation “a message Tehran needed.”
Section 11: Civilian Impact and Humanitarian Challenges
While the operation was largely surgical in its targeting of military assets, the collateral damage in urban and semi-urban zones of Iran has sparked concerns over humanitarian fallout:
- At least 183 civilian casualties were reported by unofficial Iranian sources, though these numbers are disputed.
- Hospitals in Isfahan and Tehran were overwhelmed by trauma injuries following missile explosions and drone strikes near populated zones.
- Telecommunication blackouts were reported in southern and central Iran for nearly 18 hours post-strike.
- International NGOs expressed concern over restricted access to the affected zones, as the IRGC cordoned off key neighborhoods and denied entry to aid workers.
A confidential UN report (leaked to select media outlets) warned of “a looming health crisis in Tehran’s southern districts” due to compromised water pipelines and power outages.
Section 12: Operation Rising Lion’s Long-Term Strategic Goals
For Israel, the purpose of Operation Rising Lion extended beyond immediate retaliation for Hamas’s past attacks or Iran’s proxy aggression. The operation was designed to:
- Cripple Iran’s nuclear breakout capability for the next 5-10 years.
- Destroy Iran’s long-range missile manufacturing and deployment capacity.
- Undermine the IRGC’s logistical and intelligence networks.
- Instill deterrence by demonstrating Israel’s ability to strike from within Iran’s own territory.
- Rebuild public trust in Israeli intelligence post-2023, following criticisms over lapses that led to the surprise Hamas invasion.
While the full strategic success of these goals remains to be evaluated, military experts agree that Israel has delivered the most devastating covert strike on a sovereign adversary since the Osirak raid in 1981.
Section 13: Mossad’s Technological Edge – From Cyber Espionage to Smart Targeting
The operational backbone of Israel’s success in “Operation Rising Lion” lies in the unmatched technological capabilities of its premier intelligence agency, Mossad. Over the years, Mossad has leveraged Israel’s thriving tech ecosystem—often called “Silicon Wadi”—to build a sophisticated infrastructure of cyber surveillance, electronic warfare, and unmanned combat systems.
Key technologies used in the operation included:
- AI-Enhanced Reconnaissance: Satellite and drone surveillance was powered by artificial intelligence that could recognize and track mobile missile units, radar positions, and suspicious transport patterns in real-time—even when disguised.
- Encrypted Mesh Networks: Mossad operatives embedded inside Iran communicated using decentralized, low-detectability mesh communication devices, allowing real-time data transmission without alerting Iran’s cyber defense grid.
- Miniature Drones with Autonomous Targeting: Deployed from within Iran itself, some drones used in the operation were as small as a crow and programmed to identify specific heat signatures or electromagnetic patterns emitted by Iranian air defense radars.
- Deepfake Audio Interference: One senior Israeli cyber expert, under anonymity, revealed that Mossad used synthetic voice replication tools to spoof IRGC radio chatter during the airstrikes, misleading ground crews and delaying Iran’s response.
This fusion of advanced technology with field intelligence has redefined the scope of espionage and raised the global bar for covert military operations.
Section 14: The Human Element – Training and Field Operations
Despite Mossad’s reliance on high-tech tools, its operatives remain its greatest asset. “Our machines don’t think like Iranians. Our agents do,” said one retired Israeli intelligence trainer.
Details from Israeli defense sources suggest:
- Dozens of Mossad operatives were inserted into Iran over a period of two years, posing as traders, migrant workers, and foreign students. Most were fluent in Persian and had been psychologically profiled for deep-cover endurance.
- Training for these agents included:
- Survival and cultural assimilation drills.
- Simulated IRGC interrogation scenarios.
- Remote demolition skills using disguised objects (e.g., briefcases, scooters, air conditioners).
- Agents embedded near military bases regularly transmitted low-frequency telemetry about troop movement, fuel deliveries, and construction activity. Much of this was used to plan the timing of Israel’s air raids to coincide with low guard rotations.
- Special operations teams, likely drawn from Sayeret Matkal (Israel’s elite commando unit), were dropped by stealth aircraft or overland via covert desert routes. These teams are believed to have placed GPS beacons near underground bunkers and critical launch pads to enable pinpoint targeting.
Section 15: Smuggling Routes and Underground Networks
Logistics played a critical role in Operation Rising Lion. Without alerting Iranian intelligence, Mossad managed to:
- Smuggle in precision-guided munitions using a series of altered commercial freight containers via Central Asia and the Caspian Sea. Goods were labeled as construction material or pharmaceutical equipment.
- Establish underground storage depots in abandoned farms, container yards, and safe houses outside Tehran and Isfahan. These held launch-ready drones, explosive kits, communication gear, and fuel cells.
- Collaborate with disgruntled elements within Iran, including minority groups like the Baloch and Kurdish militias, who helped create logistical diversions and sabotage IRGC movements in remote areas.
It is widely believed that some of these collaborators were paid via cryptocurrency transactions funneled through darknet escrow services, leaving no paper trail.
Section 16: The Art of Psychological Warfare – Winning Without Fighting
Perhaps Mossad’s most potent weapon in this operation was fear. Psychological warfare was integral to Operation Rising Lion and aimed to achieve:
- Intimidation through precision: Videos released by Mossad showed strikes that narrowly missed civilian zones, delivering a message: “We can hit anything, anywhere, any time—but we choose not to.”
- Information Control: By preempting Iran’s state media and leaking detailed footage to global press before Tehran could control the narrative, Israel sowed confusion and discredited Iranian claims of minimal damage.
- Internal Dissent: Fabricated memos and fake letters allegedly from high-ranking IRGC commanders were circulated on encrypted apps and forums like Telegram, triggering internal purges and damaging morale.
- Drone ‘Buzzing’ Campaign: In the nights leading up to the strikes, residents near key Iranian bases reported strange drone noises. These psychological tactics kept Iran’s air defense units on constant alert, exhausting resources and attention before the real operation began.
The result? A paralyzed Iranian defense infrastructure—blindsided, overworked, and deeply uncertain of where and how the next blow might fall.
Section 17: Strategic Lessons for the World
Military analysts across NATO, the UN, and even rivals like Russia and China are quietly dissecting the operation for key takeaways:
Deterrence Through Capability: Unlike previous Israeli strikes (e.g., Operation Outside the Box in Syria, 2007), this operation was not just about destruction—it was about showing off capabilities, sending a message that reverberates far beyond Iran.
Hybrid Warfare Mastery: Israel’s ability to integrate cyber, psychological, and kinetic operations sets a new standard for 21st-century conflicts.
Intelligence Depth: The depth and duration of Mossad’s infiltration into Iran suggest that no regime, however closed, is immune to prolonged covert penetration.
Section 18: Tehran in Turmoil – Iran’s Leadership Faces Internal and External Pressure
Following the devastating Israeli strikes, Iran finds itself grappling with a multi-pronged crisis: military, political, and psychological.
According to intelligence sources cited by international observers:
- At least a dozen high-ranking IRGC and nuclear program officials are either dead or missing, with central command communication disrupted in key provinces including Semnan, Isfahan, and Yazd.
- Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei reportedly summoned an emergency war council after the initial wave of strikes. Conflicting reports emerged about whether he was moved to a secure underground facility near Mashhad.
- There are signs of internal fractures between Iran’s civilian leadership and the Revolutionary Guard Corps. Leaked footage and intercepted communications suggest that elements within Iran’s military establishment are blaming the regime’s failure to detect Mossad’s long-term presence.
Public outrage is also building. In cities like Shiraz, Mashhad, and Ahvaz, protests have been reported over what citizens are calling “a national embarrassment.” Calls for accountability have started to surface, despite the regime’s efforts to censor social media and detain dissenters.
Section 19: Global Diplomatic Response – The World Holds Its Breath
The global community has responded with a mixture of alarm, caution, and behind-the-scenes support.
- The United States, while publicly urging de-escalation, is said to have shared real-time satellite intelligence with Israel in the days before the operation. U.S. Secretary of State issued a carefully worded statement calling on “both sides to avoid further conflict,” but did not condemn Israel’s actions.
- European Union nations, including France and Germany, have condemned the escalation but stopped short of imposing any sanctions or embargoes. Quiet diplomacy has reportedly begun to prevent a broader Middle East war.
- Russia and China, long-standing backers of Tehran, issued strong protests, calling the strikes “a gross violation of sovereignty.” Yet neither has taken concrete action to militarily support Iran—underscoring Tehran’s isolation.
- The United Nations Security Council held an emergency closed-door session, but no consensus was reached on a resolution. Israel argued it acted in self-defense following repeated Iranian missile launches.
Meanwhile, Arab nations including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, traditional rivals of Iran, have remained largely silent, though insiders suggest they were informed in advance through backchannels.
Section 20: The Military Balance – Has Israel Redrawn the Map?
Strategic analysts agree: Operation Rising Lion marks a seismic shift in the balance of power in the Middle East.
Israel’s Defense Establishment believes the mission has:
- Crippled Iran’s ability to produce enriched uranium at scale for the foreseeable future.
- Eliminated key components of Iran’s ballistic missile command-and-control network, especially those aimed at targets in Israel, Saudi Arabia, and U.S. bases in the Gulf.
- Demonstrated Israel’s undeniable superiority in intelligence, air power, and cyber operations, even hundreds of miles from its borders.
Iran, on the other hand, is now militarily exposed, and its regional allies—Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Shiite militias in Iraq—have remained unusually quiet, fearing similar preemptive strikes.
Section 21: The Nuclear Debate – Has the Red Line Been Crossed?
One of the most significant questions now haunting global leaders: Did Israel’s strike on Iranian nuclear sites amount to an act of war under international law?
While Tel Aviv maintains that it acted in preemptive self-defense—a right enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter—legal scholars are debating whether Israel crossed a diplomatic Rubicon.
More crucially, Israel has not confirmed whether it used conventional or non-conventional bunker-buster weaponry, leading to speculation that uranium processing centers near Natanz and Fordow may have been contaminated or rendered inoperable permanently.
If confirmed, this could set a dangerous precedent where non-signatory nations to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (like Israel) reserve the right to eliminate emerging nuclear threats through force.
Section 22: Mossad’s Message – The War Has Changed
In an unusually bold move, Mossad Director David Barnea released a coded but public statement, saying:
“This operation was not the beginning. It was a consequence. Every regime that sponsors terrorism or threatens our survival should now look inwards and ask: how deep has Mossad already gone?”
This cryptic warning is being interpreted globally as a declaration of expanded asymmetric warfare—not just against Iran, but any hostile nation developing WMDs or harboring terror cells.
Analysts suggest that this message is meant as much for Tehran as it is for Pyongyang and Damascus.
Section 23: Civilian Toll and Humanitarian Concerns
Amid the tactical success, humanitarian agencies are raising alarms:
- Collateral damage in Iran, though minimized, includes dozens of civilian casualties. In Isfahan and Qom, residential structures close to nuclear facilities were affected by the shockwaves.
- UNICEF and Red Crescent teams have been blocked from entering key impact zones, reportedly due to “ongoing security clearance operations.”
- Iran’s health ministry reported over 200 injuries, including burns and shrapnel wounds. There are also unconfirmed reports of radiation leaks, which Israel denies.
These developments could tarnish Israel’s international image despite the operation’s surgical nature.
Section 24: The Next Chapter – Scenarios Moving Forward
The strategic fallout of Operation Rising Lion presents three likely scenarios:
- Limited Iranian Retaliation: Tehran may opt for cyberattacks, proxy strikes via Hezbollah or the Houthis, or diplomatic isolation of Israel in international forums. These responses would help save face without triggering full-scale war.
- Full Escalation: A less likely but dangerous option is a broader regional conflict, including missile exchanges and naval skirmishes in the Persian Gulf. Given Iran’s current state, this is viewed as a last resort.
- Internal Collapse and Negotiation: Some experts speculate that Iran’s weakened leadership may force a policy reset—either by moderates seeking talks or by revolutionary hardliners doubling down. Either could reshape the region’s dynamics.
Conclusion: A Historic Inflection Point
Operation Rising Lion is not merely a military success. It is a strategic doctrine—proof that intelligence, cyber capabilities, and surgical force projection can dismantle a nuclear threat without conventional warfare.
Yet the long-term stability of the Middle East remains precarious. The question is no longer whether Israel can strike again—but whether it must.
Also Read : 9 Terrifying Seconds: Eyewitness Recounts Ahmedabad Plane Crash That Felt Like an Earthquake
