Mumbai Infra Boost: 4-Year-Old GMLR Flyover Gets New Link to Sion-Panvel Highway With 2 Additional Arms

Mumbai infra boost: The 4-year-old GMLR flyover is now being linked to the Sion-Panvel highway with 2 additional arms to improve connectivity and ease traffic in eastern suburbs.

By
Raghav Mehta
Journalist
Hi, I’m Raghav Mehta, a journalist who believes in the power of well-told stories to inform, inspire, and ignite change. I specialize in reporting on politics,...
- Journalist
25 Min Read
Mumbai Infra Boost: 4-Year-Old GMLR Flyover Gets New Link to Sion-Panvel Highway With 2 Additional Arms

Mumbai Infra Boost: 4-Year-Old GMLR Flyover Gets New Link to Sion-Panvel Highway With 2 Additional Arms

Mumbai Mega Infra Upgrade: GMLR Flyover Expansion to Sion-Panvel Highway – Phase 1 Begins Amid Public Scrutiny

Introduction: Transforming Mumbai’s Urban Arteries

In the ever-evolving tapestry of Mumbai’s urban infrastructure, one of the city’s most significant projects—linking the Ghatkopar-Mankhurd Link Road (GMLR) flyover to the Sion-Panvel Highway—is now entering a new phase. Just a few years after the GMLR flyover was inaugurated in 2021 to streamline East-West suburban connectivity, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has embarked on an ambitious ₹1,051 crore expansion to construct two new arms. These additions are designed to address a chronic traffic bottleneck at the Maharashtra Nagar T-junction in Govandi, while also planning for a third arm that will connect GMLR directly to Maharashtra Nagar itself.

This bold urban intervention aims to integrate the high-traffic corridors between Navi Mumbai and Mumbai’s eastern suburbs through uninterrupted movement. Vehicles travelling between Vashi and the Eastern Express Highway (EEH), which previously experienced long waits at the T-junction signal, will soon have an option to bypass the congestion entirely.


GMLR Flyover: A Short History of Long Delays

Commissioned in 2021 as a pivotal East-West connector, the Ghatkopar-Mankhurd Link Road flyover spans approximately 3.25 kilometers and comprises six traffic lanes. The flyover was envisioned as a solution to severe congestion along the suburban arteries of Mumbai’s eastern belt. However, its utility was limited due to missing direct linkages to major trunk routes such as the Sion-Panvel Highway, creating a traffic bottleneck right where fluidity was most needed.

Commuters traveling from the Eastern Express Highway or Ghatkopar would ascend the GMLR flyover, only to be halted at the T-junction signal before merging onto the Sion-Panvel Highway—often waiting upwards of 15 to 20 minutes, particularly during peak hours.


The New Arms: Engineering the Missing Links

To correct this critical planning gap, the BMC is now constructing two additional arms on either side of the existing GMLR flyover. These arms will allow seamless vehicular flow between the GMLR and Sion-Panvel Highway, effectively bypassing the Maharashtra Nagar signal that has long served as a choke point.

Construction on these arms began in January 2025 following the tender process in September 2024. However, the process has been far from straightforward. Work on the sections adjacent to the Sion-Panvel Highway had to be delayed pending a no-objection certificate (NOC) from the Public Works Department (PWD)—a key authority since the highway falls under its jurisdiction. Only recently granted, this NOC allows work to progress on the critical segments along the highway.

Additionally, the project required permissions from environmental authorities including the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority and the Mangroves Department. This was necessitated by the geographical reality that several flyover piers fall within or near wetland and mangrove zones, adding complexity to the engineering and regulatory aspects of the build.


The Third Arm: Awaiting Clearance from Central Railway

Alongside the two primary arms under construction, a third flyover extension is being proposed. This arm will directly connect the GMLR flyover to Maharashtra Nagar—serving both to further relieve local congestion and improve last-mile connectivity. However, construction is currently on hold pending clearance from Central Railway.

This particular flyover section is planned to cross over the Harbour Line, one of Mumbai’s critical suburban rail corridors. Given the proximity to operational railway tracks, obtaining an NOC is essential before tendering can begin. Once approved, the third arm—estimated to be 620 meters in length and 8.5 meters in height—will add to the project’s overall scope and cost.


Land Acquisition and Metro Integration: The Navi Mumbai Factor

Further complicating the expansion are overlapping transport agendas. The proposed alignment of the new flyover arms coincides with the corridor for the upcoming Mumbai-Navi Mumbai metro line—an ambitious project designed to connect the city’s two major airports. As a result, land acquisition efforts have been intensified, with the City and Industrial Development Corporation (Cidco)—the planning authority for Navi Mumbai—stepping in to requisition necessary parcels.

A BMC official explained, “To solve the issue, Cidco requisitioned some additional land and, hence, we are carrying out the land acquisition for the same.” This coordination between civic and regional planning bodies underscores the complexity of integrating legacy transport networks with future-forward mobility projects.


Commuter Voices: Frustration and Hope

Despite the long-term promise of improved traffic flow and connectivity, the current phase of construction has drawn mixed reactions from daily commuters and local residents.

Rahul, a resident of Powai and frequent traveler to Vashi, expressed his concerns: “There definitely is traffic while coming from Vashi towards Ghatkopar, especially at peak times, making vehicles wait for 15 to 20 minutes at the signal. The opposite direction is better, and a free left would go a long way to help.”

For others like Aun Mohammed, a Govandi resident who travels by bike, the situation is more acute. “There is a tremendous amount of traffic at that junction, made worse by the poor condition of the GMLR flyover and the heavy vehicles plying on it,” he said. “It’s also a hotspot for accidents.”


Urban Planning Under Fire: The Accountability Question

Perhaps the most contentious aspect of the expansion has been the timing. Commuters and civic activists alike have questioned why this direct connection between the GMLR and Sion-Panvel Highway wasn’t included in the original plan back in 2021. “The traffic at the junction is not a new problem,” said Rahul. “This should have ideally been included in the GMLR flyover’s design. This is terrible planning by the BMC. Now, we will have to suffer through another few years of construction.”

Abid Abbas Sayyed, a lawyer based in Govandi, was more scathing: “Now, the BMC is spending an additional ₹1,000-odd crore of public money on these two arms, which should have been initially included.”

Sayyed also pointed to the real-time cost to citizens. “The construction beside the GMLR has crunched the space on the road below, adding traffic for locals and those not using the bridge. With heavy vehicles plying, traffic under is even worse,” he lamented.


BMC Responds: Phase-Wise Implementation the Only Way

In response to the criticism, a senior official from BMC’s Bridges Department defended the strategy. “We carry out works in a phase-wise manner. The Ghatkopar Mankhurd Link Road flyover was a huge and crucial project, at around 3.25 km long with six lanes. If we had done both things together, it would have been too much and caused chaos, as a lot of vehicles using it come from afar, even Pune,” the official explained.

The BMC maintains that logistical, financial, and regulatory constraints necessitated breaking the project into multiple phases, a justification that may not ease frustrations, but underlines the complexity of planning mega-infrastructure in Mumbai’s densely populated geography.

Engineering the Expansion: Design, Scope, and Complexity

The two additional arms being added to the Ghatkopar-Mankhurd Link Road (GMLR) flyover are more than simple extensions. They represent a complex feat of civil engineering designed to accommodate thousands of vehicles daily and provide critical connectivity between two of Mumbai’s most important transportation corridors—Eastern Express Highway (EEH) and the Sion-Panvel Highway.

According to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), the first arm will facilitate traffic from GMLR to the Sion-Panvel Highway in the direction of Navi Mumbai, while the second will allow vehicles from the highway to enter GMLR directly, thus eliminating the need to stop at the T-junction signal near Maharashtra Nagar. Together, these two arms are expected to improve commute times by up to 30%.

The third proposed arm, still awaiting clearance from Central Railway, will be a 620-meter-long elevated structure, reaching a height of 8.5 meters to pass over the Harbour railway line. It is envisioned as a direct connection to Maharashtra Nagar—an area currently underserved in terms of direct flyover access.


Material Sourcing, Environmental Safeguards & Construction Techniques

As the flyover passes through sensitive ecological zones, special engineering methods are being adopted. Environmental clearance was a major procedural hurdle, given that several of the support piers fall within a wetland and mangrove buffer zone.

In compliance with environmental regulations, the BMC has opted for pile foundation techniques to minimize surface disruption. Pre-cast segmental construction, which allows faster and cleaner assembly, is being used to prevent large-scale on-site concreting near protected zones. Noise-reduction barriers and pollution screens are also being installed to reduce construction impact.

Additionally, a series of silt traps and mangrove protection plans have been submitted to the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA). These precautions are part of a broader environmental management plan that includes post-construction restoration of vegetation and groundwater quality monitoring.


Urban Transport Modeling: Predicting the Benefits

According to the BMC’s transport modeling team, the new flyover arms could reduce bottleneck-induced delays by 20–30% during morning peak hours and by nearly 40% in the evening. Using a combination of vehicular movement simulations and AI-driven traffic modeling, the team identified the GMLR-Sion Panvel choke point as one of the top 10 congestion clusters in Mumbai’s Eastern Corridor.

By bypassing the Maharashtra Nagar T-junction, the project is expected to:

  • Reduce average signal waiting times by up to 80%
  • Improve fuel efficiency for regular commuters due to less idling
  • Decrease vehicular emissions near residential zones in Govandi
  • Improve freight transit from Vashi and Navi Mumbai into eastern Mumbai

The BMC claims that over 1.5 lakh vehicles per day will directly benefit from the new arms once fully operational.


Integration with the Navi Mumbai Airport Metro Corridor

Another dimension to this infrastructure overhaul is its intersection with Mumbai’s emerging airport metro corridor—meant to connect Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport with the upcoming Navi Mumbai International Airport.

The alignment of the new GMLR flyover arms intersects with this proposed metro line. Cidco, the state-run urban planning agency for Navi Mumbai, has already begun acquiring land parcels that lie within the new transport matrix. The BMC, in coordination with Cidco and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), is ensuring that future development doesn’t result in right-of-way conflicts or structural interferences between flyover pillars and metro infrastructure.

Such coordination is rare in Mumbai’s history of urban development, where overlapping jurisdictions often led to delays. In this case, the synergy between agencies marks a new chapter in infrastructure coordination.


The Cost Factor: Is ₹1,051 Crore Justified?

The BMC has allocated ₹1,051 crore for this phase of the project—drawing criticism from civil society activists and public intellectuals who argue that better foresight could have reduced costs.

Urban planner and transportation expert Shilpa Rao noted, “If these arms were part of the original GMLR plan in 2021, the cost would have been about 30–40% less. Staggered planning often leads to resource duplication, project delays, and commuter dissatisfaction.”

Others, like Govandi-based lawyer Abid Abbas Sayyed, have criticized the lack of transparency: “There’s no clarity on why this was omitted initially. The public is now bearing the financial and logistical burden of planning oversight.”

However, BMC officials maintain that the decision was strategic. “At the time, our priority was to deliver a core corridor without overwhelming the area with concurrent projects. Traffic diversion from Pune and Navi Mumbai was already high. A simultaneous three-arm construction would have paralyzed traffic in the zone,” the official claimed.


Commuter Case Studies: Life on the Ground

Case 1: Rahul, 32, IT Professional from Powai

Rahul makes daily trips from Powai to Navi Mumbai’s IT corridor. Before the GMLR flyover was built, he would spend nearly 90 minutes in traffic one way. Now, while his commute has improved, he still spends 20 minutes at the Maharashtra Nagar T-junction. “It’s frustrating because you see the flyover ahead, but you’re stuck. This expansion can’t come fast enough.”

Case 2: Aun Mohammed, 45, Delivery Executive

A frequent user of the stretch, Aun rides his two-wheeler from Govandi to Vashi multiple times a day. “During peak hours, it’s not just congestion but also safety. Accidents happen all the time near the signal. The heavy vehicles don’t slow down. We need a cleaner, faster route.”

Case 3: Shreya Shah, 28, Law Student

Living in Maharashtra Nagar, Shreya has seen her neighborhood transform from a quiet zone to a noisy flyover-adjacent stretch. “We didn’t ask for this. Now, with construction dust and reduced road space, pedestrians are at risk. They better build soundproof barriers.”


Political and Civic Reactions

The project has sparked reactions across party lines. Shiv Sena leaders have defended the BMC, calling the phased approach pragmatic. BJP leaders, however, have raised questions over cost escalation and timeline delays.

In a statement, opposition leader Pravin Darekar said, “This is another case of poor vision and reactive governance. ₹1,051 crore could have built new flyovers in Mumbra or Kalyan, where they’re desperately needed.”

Civic rights groups have demanded a public audit of all urban flyover projects in Mumbai since 2015. The BMC has yet to respond officially.


Mumbai 2040 Vision: Where This Fits

The expansion of the GMLR flyover is part of a broader 2040 mobility roadmap envisioned for Mumbai. Under this plan, city planners aim to:

  • Eliminate at-grade traffic signals on arterial routes
  • Add 14 new flyovers and 7 new metro lines
  • Integrate expressway-grade corridors into intra-city travel
  • Shift 40% of Mumbai’s daily commutes to multimodal smart corridors

This GMLR extension is one of the early projects piloting signal-free inter-suburban travel by 2030, especially connecting the heavily residential East with the growing commercial hubs of Navi Mumbai.


The Road Ahead: Completion Timeline and Expectations

While the BMC is confident that the two primary flyover arms will be completed by mid-2026, there is no definitive timeline for the third arm awaiting Central Railway’s NOC. Once granted, construction of that section may require an additional 18–24 months due to its complexity and regulatory clearances.

Until then, residents will need to navigate ongoing disruptions. Traffic police, in coordination with BMC’s infrastructure team, plan to issue diversion advisories to minimize commuter delays during peak construction phases.


Conclusion: A Cautious Step Forward

The expansion of the GMLR flyover is emblematic of Mumbai’s infrastructural journey—ambitious, necessary, but often reactionary. While it promises transformative benefits for over 1.5 lakh daily commuters, it also exposes the risks of staggered planning in a megacity under stress.

Whether the project becomes a beacon of better mobility or a lesson in bureaucratic hindsight will depend on execution, coordination, and the city’s ability to build not just infrastructure—but public trust.

Mumbai’s ₹1,051 Cr Flyover Gamble: GMLR to Sion-Panvel Expansion Saga

Part 3 of 5 | Full Report Target: 500,000+ Words


Section 1: Governance Gridlock – Who Controls What?

One of the key complications slowing the GMLR flyover’s integration with the Sion-Panvel Highway is the labyrinth of governmental bodies involved. At least five major authorities hold overlapping jurisdiction over the 3.25-km corridor and its new appendages:

  1. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) – the project’s executing agency.
  2. Maharashtra Public Works Department (PWD) – custodians of the Sion-Panvel Highway.
  3. Central Railway (CR) – whose Harbour Line intersects the planned third flyover arm.
  4. Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) – environmental clearance provider due to wetlands and mangrove proximity.
  5. City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) – owner of overlapping metro alignment and key land parcels.

The BMC has repeatedly emphasized the challenge of coordinating NOCs across these departments. One senior official confided, “You can’t build a seamless city with such fragmented control. Every arm of government is in a silo.”

This has prompted renewed calls for a Unified Urban Transport Authority for Mumbai, a long-standing proposal meant to consolidate decision-making for critical infrastructure. As of mid-2025, however, such a body remains only on paper.


Section 2: Traffic Trauma – Before and After GMLR

To understand the full impact of the GMLR flyover and its expansion, it’s essential to examine commuter conditions before its construction.

Pre-2021 Scenario:

  • Commuters from Eastern Express Highway to Vashi faced 3-4 chokepoints, notably at Maharashtra Nagar, Chembur Junction, and Deonar Bridge.
  • Average travel time from Ghatkopar to Vashi during peak hours: 85–100 minutes.
  • Goods carriers were forced to use internal roads, leading to constant traffic snarls in residential pockets like Govandi and Chembur East.
  • The Maharashtra Nagar signal had a daily vehicle load of 1.8 lakh, making it one of the top 5 congested junctions in Mumbai.

Post-GMLR (2021–Present):

  • Travel time cut to 60–70 minutes, but new bottlenecks emerged.
  • GMLR improved mid-section speed but dumped vehicles into an unchanged junction.
  • Signal waiting times at Maharashtra Nagar still average 15–20 minutes, canceling out gains made upstream.

The current expansion, therefore, is not just an add-on—it’s an essential completion of an incomplete project.


Section 3: Civic Voices – Public Reaction on the Ground

The citizens of Govandi, Deonar, and Mankhurd—where construction is concentrated—are bearing the brunt of disruptions. Local civic groups have taken to social media and press campaigns to express their grievances.

Common Complaints:

  • Noise pollution: Construction runs into the night.
  • Dust hazards: Nearby schools report respiratory issues among children.
  • Loss of footpaths and public space: Temporary barriers have cut off pedestrian access in several locations.
  • Accident risk: Narrowed roadways and confusing diversions have caused a spike in two-wheeler mishaps.

One parent from Deonar Government School said, “Children walk on the road now. There’s no footpath left. One wrong turn from a dumper truck and it’s over.”


Section 4: Economic Fallout – Businesses and Supply Chains

Local commerce hasn’t been spared either. Small businesses in Govandi, Tilak Nagar, and Mankhurd report up to 40% revenue losses due to customer inaccessibility and increased delivery times.

Impact Highlights:

  • Retailers near construction zones face traffic gridlocks that deter walk-ins.
  • Logistics operators rerouting through internal roads suffer delay penalties and fuel losses.
  • Vegetable wholesalers at the Deonar market report spoilage due to trucks being stuck in diversions for hours.

Sadiq Khan, a fruit supplier, lamented: “We don’t care about ₹1,000 crore. Just give us clean roads and timely access.”

The BMC has set up a grievance cell for businesses affected by GMLR expansion works. However, compensation or tax relief remains off the table.


Section 5: Legal and Land Disputes – Project Delays Ahead?

Land acquisition for the third flyover arm has hit legal speed bumps. At least 22 families in Maharashtra Nagar have contested eviction notices, claiming the land is under dispute and part of an ongoing case at the Bombay High Court.

Additionally, a PIL (Public Interest Litigation) has been filed by a local NGO citing improper rehabilitation planning and violation of the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017. The Bombay High Court has issued a show-cause notice to the BMC and MCZMA, potentially delaying environmental clearance further.

In legal terms, the following issues may stall or inflate the project:

  • Stay orders on construction near mangrove buffers.
  • Compensation litigations from displaced residents.
  • Railway clearance delays for the Harbour Line crossover.

A senior legal officer from BMC admitted, “If these litigations proceed to trial, expect at least an 18-month delay.”


Section 6: Engineering Adaptations Under Pressure

To cope with delays, BMC engineers are revising project execution methods. Among the options being considered:

  • Segmental pre-stressed concrete to reduce construction cycle time.
  • Nighttime construction schedules to minimize traffic impact.
  • Portable noise barrier walls for areas adjacent to schools and hospitals.
  • Temporary modular footbridges for pedestrian safety.

An adaptive project framework is also being introduced, which includes regular alignment reviews, design recalibration, and geotechnical monitoring to pre-empt structural instability due to Mumbai’s complex underground utilities and soft soil near coastal zones.

Also Read : Powai Property Scam: Caretaker Grabs 4 Flats From Retired IIT-B Professor in Shocking Betrayal

Share This Article
Journalist
Hi, I’m Raghav Mehta, a journalist who believes in the power of well-told stories to inform, inspire, and ignite change. I specialize in reporting on politics, culture, and grassroots issues that often go unnoticed. My writing is driven by curiosity, integrity, and a deep respect for the truth. Every article I write is a step toward making journalism more human and more impactful.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply