What Balasaheb Couldn’t Do, Devendra Fadnavis Did”: Raj Thackeray on Reunion with Uddhav Thackeray
A Political Earthquake in Maharashtra
In a dramatic statement that sent ripples through Maharashtra’s political corridors, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray declared, “What Balasaheb couldn’t do, Devendra Fadnavis did,” referring to his unexpected political reconciliation with his estranged cousin and Shiv Sena (UBT) leader, Uddhav Thackeray. This remark not only underscored the significance of their reunion but also illuminated the shifting dynamics within the state’s volatile political arena.
The quote, charged with layers of legacy, symbolism, and realpolitik, sparked both admiration and controversy. Balasaheb Thackeray, the founder of Shiv Sena and a towering figure in Maharashtra politics, had always envisioned a strong regional front, but internal rifts within the family and party scuttled that dream. The split between Raj and Uddhav in the mid-2000s marked a defining moment in Shiv Sena’s trajectory, leading to the birth of MNS. For years, the cousins remained on opposing ends of the ideological and electoral spectrum.
However, the reunion brokered with the apparent involvement of BJP leader and Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis marks an inflection point. What began as a distant possibility has now materialized into a strategic alliance aimed at reshaping the state’s political future. The question on everyone’s mind now is: Why now, and what comes next?
Breaking the Shiv Sena Legacy – What Split the Thackerays Apart
The rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray traces back to the early 2000s, a time when succession within the Shiv Sena was not just a matter of leadership but an emotional battle for legitimacy. Balasaheb, revered by many as a political patriarch, had a difficult choice to make. While Raj, with his charisma and oratory flair, was widely viewed as the natural successor, Balasaheb eventually passed the baton to his more reserved and organizationally inclined son, Uddhav.
This decision created a seismic shift in the party’s internal dynamics. Raj, feeling sidelined and undervalued, broke away in 2006 to form the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS). The move splintered the Shiv Sena voter base, especially in urban strongholds like Mumbai, Thane, and Pune. Raj aimed to carve a political identity that stayed true to his uncle’s aggressive regionalism, while introducing modern, youth-centric reforms and nationalist fervor.
Meanwhile, Uddhav took a more measured, alliance-building approach. Under his leadership, Shiv Sena initially continued its traditional alliance with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) until the post-2019 Maharashtra Assembly elections, when he famously broke ranks to form a government with the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Congress, creating the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA). This ideological somersault baffled many old Sena loyalists and further complicated the cousins’ political trajectories.
Over the years, their paths occasionally crossed during elections and civic issues, but personal bitterness and political competition kept them apart. Their parties exchanged barbs more often than agreements, with each claiming to be the true torchbearer of Balasaheb’s ideology.
It wasn’t until the MVA government collapsed in 2022, and the BJP reasserted itself in the state through Eknath Shinde’s breakaway faction, that new political calculations began to emerge. With Uddhav’s support base fractured and Raj’s influence waning, the idea of reconciliation gained traction.
The Role of Devendra Fadnavis – Kingmaker or Master Strategist?
In the chessboard of Maharashtra politics, Devendra Fadnavis has emerged not merely as a player but as a kingmaker and tactician par excellence. His behind-the-scenes role in orchestrating the Raj-Uddhav reunion is emblematic of the BJP’s evolving strategy—moving beyond brute electoral strength toward engineering political reconfigurations with long-term impact.
Fadnavis’s political journey, from a young mayor of Nagpur to the state’s Chief Minister and then Deputy CM, has been marked by a pragmatic blend of ideological fidelity and strategic adaptability. Over the years, he has demonstrated an uncanny ability to convert crises into opportunities—none more dramatically than the BJP’s 2022 alliance with Eknath Shinde, which toppled the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government.
Now, in facilitating the rapprochement between Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray, Fadnavis appears to be executing a more nuanced maneuver: uniting estranged elements of the broader Marathi Manoos political identity to consolidate power in the run-up to the 2029 Maharashtra Assembly elections.
Political Reconciliation as Strategic Engineering
The reunion is not just a product of personal healing—it is a calculated step toward rebuilding a regional front that can balance cultural pride with developmental politics. Sources close to the BJP suggest that Fadnavis engaged both Thackeray camps in discreet conversations over several months, emphasizing common ground rather than ideological purity.
What made this reconciliation palatable to both cousins, insiders suggest, was the shifting ground reality. Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena (UBT) faced organizational decline after losing the party name and symbol to Eknath Shinde’s faction. Raj Thackeray, on the other hand, saw diminishing electoral returns despite remaining a vocal critic of everything from illegal Bangladeshi immigrants to potholes in Mumbai.
Fadnavis’s pitch to them was straightforward: divided, they would continue to bleed relevance; united, they could become the pivot around which regional pride and Hindu nationalism could coalesce—especially in urban Maharashtra, which feels politically underrepresented in the current coalition dynamics.
The BJP’s Larger Gameplan
Critics argue that Fadnavis’s endgame isn’t altruistic. Rather, it’s about decentering the power that Uddhav once held in Mumbai and Thane, while integrating MNS into a broader saffron ecosystem that can neutralize anti-BJP sentiments among Marathi voters. A Raj-Uddhav alliance—under BJP patronage—could act as a buffer against both Congress and NCP in western Maharashtra, and against Eknath Shinde’s growing ambitions within the saffron bloc.
In this light, Fadnavis is not merely a peacemaker but a strategist stitching together a multi-pronged power alliance that transcends personal history and ideological baggage.
Public Reaction: Mixed, but Watching Closely
Public response to Fadnavis’s role has been polarized. Supporters laud him as a unifier who understands Maharashtra’s unique socio-political fabric. Detractors, however, accuse him of enabling political opportunism that defies ideological consistency. Social media, news debates, and Marathi dailies have exploded with commentary—some hailing this as a historic homecoming, others decrying it as a desperation pact.
Yet, Fadnavis remains unfazed. In a recent press interaction, he stated cryptically, “When you serve Maharashtra, you cannot afford the luxury of old wounds.” That single sentence encapsulates his long-term vision—a state not torn by legacies but unified by strategic intent.
A New Saffron Coalition – Can It Survive the Electoral Test?
The reunion of Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray, facilitated by Devendra Fadnavis, has triggered speculation around the emergence of a new saffron coalition in Maharashtra—a potential political force that could reshape the state’s electoral landscape. However, as promising as this configuration appears on paper, it also raises a host of critical questions: Will voters embrace this seemingly ideological volte-face? Can this fragile coalition survive the rigors of electoral politics? And most importantly, can old wounds truly heal in the heat of political ambition?
Bringing Together Fractured Legacies
The proposed coalition—featuring the BJP, the faction of Shiv Sena led by Uddhav, and the MNS—would represent an unprecedented amalgamation of forces that were, until recently, bitter adversaries. On one side stands the BJP, which prides itself on strong leadership and central governance. On the other, Uddhav Thackeray, who broke away from the BJP in 2019, accusing it of betrayal and undermining regional interests. And alongside them now is Raj Thackeray, whose party MNS has always walked a tightrope between regional chauvinism and Hindutva nationalism.
This convergence is not without friction. The foundational ideologies of each player—though aligned under the broader saffron umbrella—have diverged over the past two decades. Reconciling these differences in the run-up to the 2029 elections would require not just ideological compromise but also structural integration: seat-sharing agreements, resource pooling, and unified messaging.
The Challenge of Trust and Turf
Maharashtra’s politics is deeply territorial. Every party has carved out strongholds across regions—from the Shiv Sena’s dominance in Mumbai and Konkan, to the BJP’s growth in Vidarbha, to the MNS’s urban Marathi core in Pune and Thane. Integrating these without stepping on each other’s toes will be a herculean task.
Moreover, mutual suspicion lingers. Can Uddhav truly trust the BJP after the 2022 political upheaval? Can Raj play second fiddle in a coalition where he was once positioned as a rival to both? And can Devendra Fadnavis manage egos without destabilizing the power-sharing equilibrium?
The answers to these questions will determine not just the longevity of the alliance, but also its credibility in the eyes of the electorate.
Voter Sentiment – Still Unpredictable
Poll strategists across Maharashtra are split on the possible impact of the alliance. Early focus group studies and surveys conducted by regional poll agencies suggest a cautious optimism among urban Marathi voters, especially the youth, who see this as an opportunity for political consolidation. Others, particularly in rural and semi-urban constituencies, view the move with skepticism, interpreting it as a marriage of convenience rather than conviction.
The opposition—primarily the Sharad Pawar-led NCP faction, Congress, and even Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena—have pounced on the optics. They are painting the coalition as a betrayal of ideology, an opportunistic pact that mocks the sacrifices of past political workers and disrespects voter mandates.
Campaign Narrative: Revival or Reinvention?
For this saffron front to resonate, it must develop a unifying narrative that goes beyond symbolism. While invoking Balasaheb Thackeray’s legacy may serve as a common ideological thread, it is not sufficient to convince today’s aspirational and skeptical voters. The alliance will need to offer clear policy alternatives—on employment, urban infrastructure, farmer welfare, and law and order.
Furthermore, they must present a forward-looking vision that distinguishes itself from the failures of the MVA coalition and the internal conflicts that marked Uddhav’s previous tenure. The electorate is not merely seeking unity—it is demanding purpose and performance.
Also Read : Fury Unleashed: MNS Workers Wreck Sushil Kedia’s Office Over Bold Challenge to Raj Thackeray
